COMMON LAW

https://jnet.forumotion.com/t227-get-enlightened-for-uk-usa-human-beings-only-for-eyes-only-access-required#294

UK AND USA

REMEMBER THIS PEOPLE FOR IT TOOK 3000+ YEARS TO AWAKEN TO THIS THUS FAR!



he who does not know hes rights has no rights at all.
I AM A HUMAN BEING NOT A PERSON



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFtPYMNKADA&feature=related

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AbxwVQWgQM&feature=related

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCZB-k4jKBc&feature=related

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxBRv6nJ1oE&feature=results_main&playnext=1&list=PL7EC9E37434D4E142

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gDWVFrdYao8&feature=related (this 1 is a lil loud)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jV6bejcvPxQ&feature=related

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPwNgIsH9BA&feature=related

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYnpneQvmQU&feature=related

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pfwpwKvqnU&feature=related

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tpis5a1k8NI&feature=related


Return to sender no contract
I am a free man

An ACT iS NOT A LAW
from the Magna Carta 1297
http://www.tpuc.org/Acts_and_Charters

I DO NOT CONSENT

my name is first name second name of the family commonly known as last name
and I am a human being not a person



i accept only common law

This is not something which they can be blamed for, as nobody told them it would, or even could, happen. Nor did anybody tell them what a strawman is or how it can be used against their baby. In actual fact, the “registration” is a contract and in reality, it is null and void because there was not full disclosure by the Local Authority, nor was there ‘intent to contract’ on the part of the parents.



what a court is:
1. The serving officers of a commercial company.
2. They think up ways to take money and goods from me.
3. No, absolutely not, they help themselves and not me.
4. Slavery has NEVER been abolished and me merself, are considered to be a slave right now.
5. Yes, slavery is "legal" although it is not "lawful" (me need to discover the difference).
6. No. me are NOT in debt to any financial institution.

the government and court is a corporation,

claim that clause 61 allows them to cease obeying the state. This sometimes involves sending an affidavit direct to the Queen declaring one's intent to become a freeman and removing their consent to be governed. Some freemen believe that the Queen represents the highest authority in the land as the sovereign, but that she derives her authority from the people. This then makes them sovereign, such that there is no higher authority then myself.




Judges typically give short shrift to this kind of request, and either adjourn the hearing or threaten to accuse the freeman of contempt of court. The freeman might then ask whether the judge means civil or criminal contempt; this is because freemen believe that civil contempt would come under admiralty law, and therefore require a consensual contract, and criminal contempt would require a victim. When judges leave the courtroom, Freemen will attempt to claim common law authority and then attempt to dismiss the charges themselves, often with a cry of "ship abandoned" or "man overboard"


What makes this even worse, is the fact that they will never tell me that they have switched from English to Legalese, and if that is not dishonest, underhand and unscrupulous, then I don't know what is! If me answer the question believing that English is being spoken, then they pretend that me are contracting with them to become subordinate to them. Whether or not that is actually true is debatable because that is effectively a verbal contract between me and them and for any contract to be valid, there has to be full and open disclosure of all of the terms of the contract, and then, unreserved acceptance by both parties, and in these cases, that has most definitely, not occurred.


Think this is far fetched? Then check it out via Dun & Bradstreet or any of the other places which records the setting up and performance of the 160,000,000 commercial companies world-wide. When you do that, you will discover that, for example, the House of Commons is a commercial for-profit company (number UC2279443), The Labour Party is a commercial company which trades under the name of “Allister Darling MP”, The House of Lords which is the highest court in the land is a private company, the United Kingdom Corporation Ltd. formerly known as the “United Kingdom plc” and which never complied with the law which requires it to file it's financial records, is also a private company. The Ministry of Justice D-U-N-S Number 22-549-8526, Directors: Lord Falconer of Thoroton is a private company set up in the year 1600. The Bank of England is a private company, as is every Court and every Police Force and even the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry is a company and not a person.



http://www.tpuc.org/


he who does not know hes rights has no rights at all.


return to sender no contract
I am a free man


if you find me in content, am i in content of common law or civil law court?


an ACT is NOT A LAW
from the Magna Carta 1297
http://www.tpuc.org/Acts_and_Charters

I DO NOT CONSENT

my name is Jamie Lee of the family commonly known as Dando
and I am a human being not a person



I am a sovereign and accept only common law

~

I claim that the courts in united kingdom are de-facto and in fact in the profitable business of conducting.


witnessing and facilitating the transactions of security interests and I further claim that they require both parties prior to providing any such services, I do hereby deny consent to any transaction of security interest issuing under any act for as herein
stated as a freeman-on-the-land I am not subject to any act.

furthermore i claim my fee schedule for any transgression by peace officers, government principals or agents of justice system participants is £250 per hour or portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained,
harassed, searched or otherwise regulated.

and £250,000 if i am handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to to any adjudication process without my express written and notarized consent.



This is not something which they can be blamed for, as nobody told them it would, or even could, happen. Nor did anybody tell them what a straw-man is or how it can be used against their baby. in actual fact, the “registration” is a contract and in reality, it is null and void because there was not full disclosure by the Local Authority, nor was there ‘intent to contract’ on the part of the parents.



what a court is:
1. The serving officers of a commercial company.
2. They think up ways to take money and goods from me.
3. No, absolutely not, they help themselves and not me.
4. Slavery has NEVER been abolished and me merself, are considered to be a slave right now.
5. Yes, slavery is "legal" although it is not "lawful" (me need to discover the difference).
6. No. me are NOT in debt to any financial institution.

the government and court is a corporation,

claim that clause 61 allows them to cease obeying the state. This sometimes involves sending an affidavit direct to the Queen declaring one's intent to become a freeman and removing their consent to be governed. Some freemen believe that the Queen represents the highest authority in the land as the sovereign, but that she derives her authority from the people. This then makes them sovereign, such that there is no higher authority then myself.




Judges typically give short shrift to this kind of request, and either adjourn the hearing or threaten to accuse the freeman of contempt of court. The freeman might then ask whether the judge means civil or criminal contempt; this is because freemen believe that civil contempt would come under admiralty law, and therefore require a consensual contract, and criminal contempt would require a victim. When judges leave the courtroom, Freemen will attempt to claim common law authority and then attempt to dismiss the charges themselves, often with a cry of "ship abandoned" or "man overboard"


What makes this even worse, is the fact that the court would never tell me that they have switched from English to Legalese, and if that is not dishonest, underhand and unscrupulous, then Idon't know what is! if me answer the question believing that English is being spoken, then they pretend that me are contracting with them to become subordinate to them. Whether or not that is actually true is debatable because that is effectively a verbal contract between me and them and for any contract to be valid, there has to be full and open disclosure of all of the terms of the contract, and then, unreserved acceptance by both parties, and in these cases, that has most definitely, not occurred.


Think this is far fetched? Then check it out via Dun & Bradstreet or any of the other places which records the setting up and performance of the 160,000,000 commercial companies world-wide. When you do that, you will discover that, for example, the House of Commons is a commercial for-profit company (number UC2279443), The Labour Party is a commercial company which trades under the name of “Allister Darling MP”, The House of Lords which is the highest court in the land is a private company, the United Kingdom Corporation Ltd. formerly known as the “United Kingdom plc” and which never complied with the law which requires it to file it's financial records, is also a private company. The Ministry of Justice D-U-N-S Number 22-549-8526, Directors: Lord Falconer of Thoroton is a private company set up in the year 1600. The Bank of England is a private company, as is every Court and every Police Force and even the Secretary of State for Trade and industry is a company and I am not a person, I am a human being.


















J~Net Address Is: http://2.223.40.114

Or

http://pctechsupport.sytes.net




please reply with your input or link